FT.com / Companies / Aerospace & Defence - WTO rules Boeing had illegal subsidies
WTO rules Boeing had illegal subsidies
By Peggy Hollinger in Paris, Nikki Tait in Brussels, Hal Weitzman in Chicago and Robin Harding in Washington
Published: January 31 2011 22:23 | Last updated: January 31 2011 22:23
Boeing’s flagship 787 Dreamliner has benefited from illegal US government subsidies that have distorted market competition, according to the World Trade Organisation.
The ruling, which will not be published for several weeks, marks a key moment in a bitter six-year trade dispute that has pitched the European Union against the US over the funding of their respective aircraft makers.
EDITOR’S CHOICE
Dreamliner delays to hit Boeing profits - Jan-26.Southwest warns on switch to Airbus - Jan-20.Boeing pushes back Dreamliner delivery - Jan-18.Airbus edges ahead of Boeing in orders - Jan-17..In June, the WTO ruled that Airbus, the Franco-German aircraft maker, had also benefited from illegal aid in the form of repayable loans linked to export sales in the development of its A380 superjumbo.
The two rulings will now step up the pressure on politicians from both sides to negotiate a settlement and find a new agreement on the acceptable form for state aid.
The current row, the largest trade dispute ever brought before the WTO, was sparked when the US government abandoned a previous accord hammered out in 1992.
But the arrival of new, aggressive competitors, such as Brazil and China, is making the need for common rules on the financing of new aircraft more pressing, say industry executives.
The European Commission welcomed the findings, which will remain confidential until formally published in the next few weeks. A spokesman for EU trade commissioner Karel de Gucht said it was a “solid report” that “sheds further light on the negative consequences for the EU industry of these US subsidies and provides a timely element of balance in this long-running dispute”.
Airbus claimed that the ruling found at least $5bn in US government aid illegal – much of which was channelled through the Department of Defense and the Nasa space agency.
In addition, a further $2bn in state and local subsidies were deemed unfair, the group said. The aircraft maker said the report would show that Boeing could not have launched its rival to Airbus’s A380, the 787 Dreamliner, without this illegal aid, which it claimed had cost it $45bn in lost sales.
Boeing said the report would show that the WTO had rejected almost all of Europe’s claims against the US, including the vast majority of its R&D claims. “Nothing in today’s reports even begins to compare to the $20bn in illegal subsidies that the WTO found last June that Airbus/EADS has received,” it said.
The US government also rejected the European claim of victory. Nefeterius McPherson, spokesman for Ron Kirk, the US trade representative, said the US was “confident that the WTO will confirm the US view that European subsidies to Airbus dwarf any subsidies that the US provided to Boeing.”
Both sides are appealing against the WTO’s decision last year on European aid to Airbus. They are also expected to appeal against the latest decision on US aid to Boeing. Each side will have 60 days to appeal.
.Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2011. You may share
Monday, January 31, 2011
Alberta-tar-sands-trade-agreement
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jan/31/alberta-tar-sands-trade-agreement
Trade talks between Europe and Canada could leave the door open to companies suing states for losses incurred by efforts to fight climate change, campaigners claimed today.
The warning, backed by an MEP and a law expert, came as 10 protesters unsuccessfully attempted to talk to the Canadian energy minister, Ron Liepert, this morning during a visit to London for a meeting with Lord Howell, the UK minister for the Commonwealth.
Liepert is visiting the UK and Belgium to promote tar sands in the Canadian province of Alberta as a "leading source of secure energy". The protesters tried unsuccessfully to gain access to the Canadian high commission on Grosvenor Square.
Concern is focused on the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (Ceta), a trade deal which Canada and the EU have been negotiating for the last two years and which they hope to finally sign in 2012. Campaigners say Ceta could affect governments' rights to regulate themselves and could also open the door for tar sands oil to be imported into Europe.
The agreement, which is in draft form, includes a clause allowing corporations to sue states for compensation if they feel their earnings have been unfairly compromised. Campaigners fear the agreement would give investors leverage against proposed changes to the EU fuel quality directive, which MEPs are reviewing to decide if it should discriminate against carbon-intensive fuel, such as tar sands oil.
"The proposed trade agreement between Canada and the EU will have a substantial impact on efforts to address the local, regional and global impacts of oil sands developments," was the conclusion drawn by lawyer
Trade talks between Europe and Canada could leave the door open to companies suing states for losses incurred by efforts to fight climate change, campaigners claimed today.
The warning, backed by an MEP and a law expert, came as 10 protesters unsuccessfully attempted to talk to the Canadian energy minister, Ron Liepert, this morning during a visit to London for a meeting with Lord Howell, the UK minister for the Commonwealth.
Liepert is visiting the UK and Belgium to promote tar sands in the Canadian province of Alberta as a "leading source of secure energy". The protesters tried unsuccessfully to gain access to the Canadian high commission on Grosvenor Square.
Concern is focused on the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (Ceta), a trade deal which Canada and the EU have been negotiating for the last two years and which they hope to finally sign in 2012. Campaigners say Ceta could affect governments' rights to regulate themselves and could also open the door for tar sands oil to be imported into Europe.
The agreement, which is in draft form, includes a clause allowing corporations to sue states for compensation if they feel their earnings have been unfairly compromised. Campaigners fear the agreement would give investors leverage against proposed changes to the EU fuel quality directive, which MEPs are reviewing to decide if it should discriminate against carbon-intensive fuel, such as tar sands oil.
"The proposed trade agreement between Canada and the EU will have a substantial impact on efforts to address the local, regional and global impacts of oil sands developments," was the conclusion drawn by lawyer
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Cable :Brazil ,Oil,& Trade Concessions
Cable Viewer
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR DISCUSSES BRAZILIAN OIL CONCESSION MODEL WITH DELFIM NETTO
the concession model and even more unlikely that it would choose to change the rules on existing concessions. Political and economic stability have been the cornerstones of Brazil's policies and largely led to Brazil obtaining investment grade status (Ref D). While some modification of exploration and concession rules may take place for these new "mega fields", it is doubtful the GOB would do anything to undermine the overall image of Brazil as a stable country in which to invest.
¶7. (C) Unlike Delfim Netto's view that the USG should hold off on intervening to establish these new rules, Brazil's Ministry of Mines and Energy, regulators, and US energy companies have suggested that it could instead be within this period for the USG to intervene. Indeed, Petrobras' interest in consolidating deep-sea drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and vertical integration in the US market could open an important window of opportunity for the USG. Furthermore, ANP has expressed interest in learning more about US small and medium sized energy companies operating in US states to develop a similar capacity in Brazil. They have, in fact, asked for USG assistance to travel to the US to meet with and further learn about this important part of the energy equation. Clearly, Brazil's energy sector offers new partnerships, opportunities, and increased energy security for the US. As Brazil begins to increase exploration of its newfound "pre-salt" reserves that many believe could be larger than the finds in the North Sea, the US could potentially capitalize on these new technologies to develop our own offshore exploration efforts. Early engagement may be crucial to ensuring that US firms will have opportunities in this market. END COMMENT
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR DISCUSSES BRAZILIAN OIL CONCESSION MODEL WITH DELFIM NETTO
the concession model and even more unlikely that it would choose to change the rules on existing concessions. Political and economic stability have been the cornerstones of Brazil's policies and largely led to Brazil obtaining investment grade status (Ref D). While some modification of exploration and concession rules may take place for these new "mega fields", it is doubtful the GOB would do anything to undermine the overall image of Brazil as a stable country in which to invest.
¶7. (C) Unlike Delfim Netto's view that the USG should hold off on intervening to establish these new rules, Brazil's Ministry of Mines and Energy, regulators, and US energy companies have suggested that it could instead be within this period for the USG to intervene. Indeed, Petrobras' interest in consolidating deep-sea drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and vertical integration in the US market could open an important window of opportunity for the USG. Furthermore, ANP has expressed interest in learning more about US small and medium sized energy companies operating in US states to develop a similar capacity in Brazil. They have, in fact, asked for USG assistance to travel to the US to meet with and further learn about this important part of the energy equation. Clearly, Brazil's energy sector offers new partnerships, opportunities, and increased energy security for the US. As Brazil begins to increase exploration of its newfound "pre-salt" reserves that many believe could be larger than the finds in the North Sea, the US could potentially capitalize on these new technologies to develop our own offshore exploration efforts. Early engagement may be crucial to ensuring that US firms will have opportunities in this market. END COMMENT
Innovative Sustainability Instruments for the Green Economy: A Law & Policy Experts Panel on Strengthening Carbon Markets by Integrating the Environmental and Social Impacts of Trade & Investment
ICTSD Symposium on the Role of Trade and Markets in Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development at the COP16
Held on Thursday, 09 Dec 2010, Hotel Azul Sensatori, Cancun, Mexico
Summary
This law and policy experts panel focused on the role that new instruments, such as impact assessments and carbon pricing tools, can play in helping to address climate change and secure more sustainable development. It addressed questions such as what key climate change challenges have been raised in recent impact assessments of trade and investment treaties, and how are new market based instruments being deployed to address them; how can these instruments support the transition to a low carbon economy and harness trade & investment for sustainable development; and what can be learned from recent EU, Canada and US experiences, and from policy experiments in developing countries. To access the report please click here.
ICTSD Symposium on the Role of Trade and Markets in Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development at the COP16
Held on Thursday, 09 Dec 2010, Hotel Azul Sensatori, Cancun, Mexico
Summary
This law and policy experts panel focused on the role that new instruments, such as impact assessments and carbon pricing tools, can play in helping to address climate change and secure more sustainable development. It addressed questions such as what key climate change challenges have been raised in recent impact assessments of trade and investment treaties, and how are new market based instruments being deployed to address them; how can these instruments support the transition to a low carbon economy and harness trade & investment for sustainable development; and what can be learned from recent EU, Canada and US experiences, and from policy experiments in developing countries. To access the report please click here.
Water on BNN
While Canada has the most fresh water in the world, what are the risks that need to be managed to keep that supply clean and abundant? Headline speaks with Sandra Odendahl, Director of Corporate Environmental Affairs at RBC Financial Group; Richard Whittaker, Vice-President, Sustainable Development Technologies Canada; and Dr. Anthony Watanabe, President & CEO of Innovolve Group
Module 3-Investment law and Trade Law
In this section, the instructors will present learning modules related to economic growth and prosperity; global, regional and bilateral trade law; international investment agreements; cross-border transactions; and international financial rules and the credit crisis.
The economic growth and prosperity section will address key concepts such as the definition of trade, and key trade theories. The global, regional and bilateral trade law section will provide an overview of the key principles and rules of global, regional, and bilateral trade agreements, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada. These regimes include the World Trade Organisation, NAFTA, and Canadian bilateral trade agreements. The international investment agreements section will provide an overview of the development of international investment agreements and investment chapters of trade agreements, of Canadian involvement in international investment agreements and bilateral investment agreements, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada. The cross-border transactions section will provide an overview of the rules governing Canadian-US cross-border transactions, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada. Finally, the international financial rules and the credit crisis section will provide an overview of legal elements of the recent credit crisis and the emerging international financial rules stemming from the credit crisis, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada.
The economic growth and prosperity section will address key concepts such as the definition of trade, and key trade theories. The global, regional and bilateral trade law section will provide an overview of the key principles and rules of global, regional, and bilateral trade agreements, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada. These regimes include the World Trade Organisation, NAFTA, and Canadian bilateral trade agreements. The international investment agreements section will provide an overview of the development of international investment agreements and investment chapters of trade agreements, of Canadian involvement in international investment agreements and bilateral investment agreements, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada. The cross-border transactions section will provide an overview of the rules governing Canadian-US cross-border transactions, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada. Finally, the international financial rules and the credit crisis section will provide an overview of legal elements of the recent credit crisis and the emerging international financial rules stemming from the credit crisis, highlighting emerging trends of relevance to the practice of law in Canada.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Canada lobbied U.S. TransCanada’s Keystone pipeline
Canada lobbied U.S. over TransCanada’s Keystone pipeline | FP Posted | Financial Post
By Stanley Tromp
Canada’s ambassador to the United States wrote to the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last fall, asking it to disregard greenhouse gas emissions from Alberta oil extraction as it decides whether to support a proposed massive Canadian pipeline to Texas.
As well, one Alberta bureaucrat warned the EPA its greenhouse gas policies could place at risk “the longstanding energy trading relationship between our two jurisdictions.”
The letters, including one from Canadian ambassador Gary Doer to the EPA’s most senior official and copied to Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State, reveal an officially polite but tough disagreement over jurisdictional authority and greenhouse gas emissions.
PDF: Click here to read the letters.
The discord revolves around TransCanada Corp.’s proposed $8-billion, 2,673-kilometre, metre-thick Keystone XL pipeline. The pipeline would ship 500,000 barrels each day of raw bitumen from Alberta to refineries along the Gulf Coast in Texas by 2013, and has the potential to double the U.S. consumption of Canadian crude oil.
The project is staunchly opposed by environmentalists and many U.S. politicians. Calgary-based TransCanada still awaits a presidential permit from the U.S. State Department, which has to approve the pipeline because it crosses an international border. In deliberating, the State Department sought advice about the proposal from the EPA and seven other agencies.
On July 21, 2010, Cynthia Giles, the EPA’s assistant administrator for enforcement and compliance assurance, gave the State Department’s draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for Keystone XL its lowest possible rating.
Read more: http://business.financialpost.com/2011/01/23/canada-lobbies-u-s-over-transcanadas-keystone-pipeline/#ixzz1C0eaRDYC
By Stanley Tromp
Canada’s ambassador to the United States wrote to the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last fall, asking it to disregard greenhouse gas emissions from Alberta oil extraction as it decides whether to support a proposed massive Canadian pipeline to Texas.
As well, one Alberta bureaucrat warned the EPA its greenhouse gas policies could place at risk “the longstanding energy trading relationship between our two jurisdictions.”
The letters, including one from Canadian ambassador Gary Doer to the EPA’s most senior official and copied to Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State, reveal an officially polite but tough disagreement over jurisdictional authority and greenhouse gas emissions.
PDF: Click here to read the letters.
The discord revolves around TransCanada Corp.’s proposed $8-billion, 2,673-kilometre, metre-thick Keystone XL pipeline. The pipeline would ship 500,000 barrels each day of raw bitumen from Alberta to refineries along the Gulf Coast in Texas by 2013, and has the potential to double the U.S. consumption of Canadian crude oil.
The project is staunchly opposed by environmentalists and many U.S. politicians. Calgary-based TransCanada still awaits a presidential permit from the U.S. State Department, which has to approve the pipeline because it crosses an international border. In deliberating, the State Department sought advice about the proposal from the EPA and seven other agencies.
On July 21, 2010, Cynthia Giles, the EPA’s assistant administrator for enforcement and compliance assurance, gave the State Department’s draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for Keystone XL its lowest possible rating.
Read more: http://business.financialpost.com/2011/01/23/canada-lobbies-u-s-over-transcanadas-keystone-pipeline/#ixzz1C0eaRDYC
http://www.theparliament.com/latest-news/article/newsarticle/top-canadian-official-says-fta-deal-with-the-eu-is-imminent/
http://www.theparliament.com/latest-news/article/newsarticle/top-canadian-official-says-fta-deal-with-the-eu-is-imminent/
By Martin Banks - 24th January 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“I expect our producers will take full advantage of this”
Ross Hornby
Canada's ambassador to the EU says he is confident a free trade agreement (FTA) with the EU will be signed this year.
Speaking in Brussels on Monday, Ross Hornby said that "rapid progress" had been made in negotiations between the two sides since talks on an FTA started in 2009.
The start of duty-free access to the EU for Canadian beef producers last November was the "first step" towards a fully-fledged FTA, said Hornby.
He was speaking at an event to mark successfully-completed negotiations to give Canada beef producers duty free access to the EU market.
This is estimated to be worth more than €7.3m annually for Canada.
Hornby said, "I am extremely pleased that Canada for the first time in 21 years has been able to regain access to the EU markets.
"I expect our producers will take full advantage of this.
"I am equally pleased to see the rapid progress in the FTA talks and I hope that 2011 will be a big year for concluding these negotiations."
By Martin Banks - 24th January 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“I expect our producers will take full advantage of this”
Ross Hornby
Canada's ambassador to the EU says he is confident a free trade agreement (FTA) with the EU will be signed this year.
Speaking in Brussels on Monday, Ross Hornby said that "rapid progress" had been made in negotiations between the two sides since talks on an FTA started in 2009.
The start of duty-free access to the EU for Canadian beef producers last November was the "first step" towards a fully-fledged FTA, said Hornby.
He was speaking at an event to mark successfully-completed negotiations to give Canada beef producers duty free access to the EU market.
This is estimated to be worth more than €7.3m annually for Canada.
Hornby said, "I am extremely pleased that Canada for the first time in 21 years has been able to regain access to the EU markets.
"I expect our producers will take full advantage of this.
"I am equally pleased to see the rapid progress in the FTA talks and I hope that 2011 will be a big year for concluding these negotiations."
CISDL-ILA Continuing Legal Education Course in International Law
CISDL-ILA Continuing Legal Education Course in International Law
Welcome to the course page for the following module: Emerging Issues in Trade & Investment Law: Briefing for Canadian Lawyers
This module lasts approximately 5 hours, and allows for 5 CLE credits with the Quebec Bar Association.
In this section, the instructors will present learning modules related to economic growth and prosperity; global, regional and bilateral trade law; international investment agreements; cross-border transactions; and international financial rules and the credit crisis.
Please click on the links below in order to access the course content (video and power point)
Once you have finished the course, please email preynaud@cisdl.org with cc to info@cisdl.org in order to receive your certificate of completion
Welcome to the course page for the following module: Emerging Issues in Trade & Investment Law: Briefing for Canadian Lawyers
This module lasts approximately 5 hours, and allows for 5 CLE credits with the Quebec Bar Association.
In this section, the instructors will present learning modules related to economic growth and prosperity; global, regional and bilateral trade law; international investment agreements; cross-border transactions; and international financial rules and the credit crisis.
Please click on the links below in order to access the course content (video and power point)
Once you have finished the course, please email preynaud@cisdl.org with cc to info@cisdl.org in order to receive your certificate of completion
Japan Challenges Canadian Renewable Energy Incentives at WTO
http://ictsd.org/i/news/biores/99472/
Japan launched dispute settlement proceedings against Canada at the World Trade Organization on 13 September by saying that the province of Ontario’s green energy plan unfairly pressures its producers of clean power to buy hardware from local manufacturers.
Specifically, Japan is challenging Ontario’s Feed-in Tariff Program (FIT), which enables the province to subsidise electricity operators that use renewable energy produced using stringent local content requirements. The “made-in-Ontario” requirement demands that up to 60 percent of all green energy project inputs be manufactured in the province as it strives to create local jobs.
Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, launched an incentive program for renewable energy producers last October, aiming to create jobs and eliminate coal-fired power generators. The program has so far been very successful in drawing manufacturers to set up shop in Ontario. The biggest deal under the province’s green power plan involved South Korean giant Samsung Group. But many other equipment makers - based
Japan launched dispute settlement proceedings against Canada at the World Trade Organization on 13 September by saying that the province of Ontario’s green energy plan unfairly pressures its producers of clean power to buy hardware from local manufacturers.
Specifically, Japan is challenging Ontario’s Feed-in Tariff Program (FIT), which enables the province to subsidise electricity operators that use renewable energy produced using stringent local content requirements. The “made-in-Ontario” requirement demands that up to 60 percent of all green energy project inputs be manufactured in the province as it strives to create local jobs.
Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, launched an incentive program for renewable energy producers last October, aiming to create jobs and eliminate coal-fired power generators. The program has so far been very successful in drawing manufacturers to set up shop in Ontario. The biggest deal under the province’s green power plan involved South Korean giant Samsung Group. But many other equipment makers - based
US vs China re:windpower
http://ictsd.org/i/news/biores/99472/
The US last month initiated dispute proceedings against China at the WTO, alleging that Beijing’s special fund for wind power manufacturing is an illegal subsidy under international trade law.
Trade tensions between the two countries have heated up in recent months, as Washington’s request for consultations, dated 22 December, represents the second time in less than four months that it has accused China of violating WTO rules. The Obama administration has also been increasingly concerned that US companies risk falling behind their Chinese counterparts in the area of clean energy.
Beijing insists its policies are both within the bounds of WTO rules and good for the environment. The Chinese commerce ministry said in a statement on its website that it “will conscientiously study the US request for consultations, and will deal with this in accordance with WTO dispute settlement rules.”
The US last month initiated dispute proceedings against China at the WTO, alleging that Beijing’s special fund for wind power manufacturing is an illegal subsidy under international trade law.
Trade tensions between the two countries have heated up in recent months, as Washington’s request for consultations, dated 22 December, represents the second time in less than four months that it has accused China of violating WTO rules. The Obama administration has also been increasingly concerned that US companies risk falling behind their Chinese counterparts in the area of clean energy.
Beijing insists its policies are both within the bounds of WTO rules and good for the environment. The Chinese commerce ministry said in a statement on its website that it “will conscientiously study the US request for consultations, and will deal with this in accordance with WTO dispute settlement rules.”
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
‘Graying Revolution’ Reaches Low- and Middle-income Countries
News & Broadcast - ‘Graying Revolution’ Reaches Low- and Middle-income Countries
-Developing and middle-income countries must care for growing numbers of the elderly but often without enough money and experience.
-Developing and middle-income countries must care for growing numbers of the elderly but often without enough money and experience.
International Economic Law and Policy Blog: The Role of Intent in WTO Non-Discrimination Obligations
International Economic Law and Policy Blog: The Role of Intent in WTO Non-Discrimination Obligations
The role of the recovery of the dolphin and the purse seine tuna fisheries and depleting fish stocks ....
The role of the recovery of the dolphin and the purse seine tuna fisheries and depleting fish stocks ....
Monday, January 17, 2011
International Economic Law and Policy Blog: Location Subsidies for Solar Panel Production
International Economic Law and Policy Blog: Location Subsidies for Solar Panel Production
Aided by at least $43 million in assistance from the government of Massachusetts and an innovative solar energy technology, Evergreen Solar emerged in the last three years as the third-largest maker of solar panels in the United States.
But now the company is closing its main American factory, laying off the 800 workers by the end of March and shifting production to a joint venture with a Chinese company in central China. Evergreen cited the much higher government support available in China.
...
China’s real advantage lies in the ability of solar panel companies to form partnerships with local governments and then obtain loans at very low interest rates from state-owned banks.
Evergreen, with help from its partners — the Wuhan municipal government and the Hubei provincial government — borrowed two-thirds of the cost of its Wuhan factory from two Chinese banks, at an interest rate that under certain conditions could go as low as 4.8 percent, Mr. El-Hillow said in August. Best of all, no principal payments or interest payments will be due until the end of the loan in 2015.
By contrast, a $21 million grant from Massachusetts covered 5 percent of the cost of the Devens factory, and the company had to borrow the rest from banks, Mr. El-Hillow said.
Banks in the United States were reluctant to provide the rest of the money even at double-digit interest rates, partly because of the financial crisis. “Therein lies the hidden advantage of being in China,” Mr. El-Hillow said.
Aided by at least $43 million in assistance from the government of Massachusetts and an innovative solar energy technology, Evergreen Solar emerged in the last three years as the third-largest maker of solar panels in the United States.
But now the company is closing its main American factory, laying off the 800 workers by the end of March and shifting production to a joint venture with a Chinese company in central China. Evergreen cited the much higher government support available in China.
...
China’s real advantage lies in the ability of solar panel companies to form partnerships with local governments and then obtain loans at very low interest rates from state-owned banks.
Evergreen, with help from its partners — the Wuhan municipal government and the Hubei provincial government — borrowed two-thirds of the cost of its Wuhan factory from two Chinese banks, at an interest rate that under certain conditions could go as low as 4.8 percent, Mr. El-Hillow said in August. Best of all, no principal payments or interest payments will be due until the end of the loan in 2015.
By contrast, a $21 million grant from Massachusetts covered 5 percent of the cost of the Devens factory, and the company had to borrow the rest from banks, Mr. El-Hillow said.
Banks in the United States were reluctant to provide the rest of the money even at double-digit interest rates, partly because of the financial crisis. “Therein lies the hidden advantage of being in China,” Mr. El-Hillow said.
Friday, January 14, 2011
The Doha agenda
WTO | Understanding the WTO - The Doha agenda
At the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha, Qatar, in November 2001 WTO member governments agreed to launch new negotiations. They also agreed to work on other issues, in particular the implementation of the present agreements. The entire package is called the Doha Development Agenda (DDA).
The negotiations take place in the Trade Negotiations Committee and its subsidiaries, which are usually, either regular councils and committees meeting in “special sessions”, or specially-created negotiating groups. Other work under the work programme takes place in other WTO councils and committees.
The Fifth Ministerial Conference in Cancún, Mexico, in September 2003, was intended as a stock-taking meeting where members would agree on how to complete the rest of the negotiations. But the meeting was soured by discord on agricultural issues, including cotton, and ended in deadlock on the “Singapore issues” (see below). Real progress on the Singapore issues and agriculture was not evident until the early hours of 1 August 2004 with a set of decisions in the General Council (sometimes called the July 2004 package). The original 1 January 2005 deadline was missed. After that, members unofficially aimed to finish the negotiations by the end of 2006, again unsuccessfully. Further progress in narrowing members’ differences was made at the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference in December 2005, but some gaps remained unbridgeable and Director-General Pascal Lamy suspended the negotiations in July 2006. Efforts then focused on trying to achieve a breakthrough in early 2007.
At the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha, Qatar, in November 2001 WTO member governments agreed to launch new negotiations. They also agreed to work on other issues, in particular the implementation of the present agreements. The entire package is called the Doha Development Agenda (DDA).
The negotiations take place in the Trade Negotiations Committee and its subsidiaries, which are usually, either regular councils and committees meeting in “special sessions”, or specially-created negotiating groups. Other work under the work programme takes place in other WTO councils and committees.
The Fifth Ministerial Conference in Cancún, Mexico, in September 2003, was intended as a stock-taking meeting where members would agree on how to complete the rest of the negotiations. But the meeting was soured by discord on agricultural issues, including cotton, and ended in deadlock on the “Singapore issues” (see below). Real progress on the Singapore issues and agriculture was not evident until the early hours of 1 August 2004 with a set of decisions in the General Council (sometimes called the July 2004 package). The original 1 January 2005 deadline was missed. After that, members unofficially aimed to finish the negotiations by the end of 2006, again unsuccessfully. Further progress in narrowing members’ differences was made at the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference in December 2005, but some gaps remained unbridgeable and Director-General Pascal Lamy suspended the negotiations in July 2006. Efforts then focused on trying to achieve a breakthrough in early 2007.
WTO | Understanding the WTO - A unique contribution
WTO | Understanding the WTO - A unique contribution
Click the + to open an item.
Understanding the WTO
Basics
Agreements
Settling disputes
A unique contribution
The panel process
Case study
Cross-cutting and new issues
The Doha agenda
Developing countries
The organization
Abbreviations
More introductory information
> The WTO in Brief
> 10 benefits
> 10 misunderstandings
Principles: equitable, fast, effective, mutually acceptable back to top
Disputes
Click the + to open an item.
Understanding the WTO
Basics
Agreements
Settling disputes
A unique contribution
The panel process
Case study
Cross-cutting and new issues
The Doha agenda
Developing countries
The organization
Abbreviations
More introductory information
> The WTO in Brief
> 10 benefits
> 10 misunderstandings
Principles: equitable, fast, effective, mutually acceptable back to top
Disputes
WTO | 2011 News items - Geographical indications talks produce first single draft
WTO | 2011 News items - Geographical indications talks produce first single draft
Dispute settlement is the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and the WTO’s unique contribution to the stability of the global economy. Without a means of settling disputes, the rules-based system would be less effective because the rules could not be enforced. The WTO’s procedure underscores the rule of law, and it makes the trading system more secure and predictable. The system is based on clearly-defined rules, with timetables for completing a case. First rulings are made by a panel and endorsed (or rejected) by the WTO’s full membership. Appeals based on points of law are possible.
However, the point is not to pass judgement. The priority is to settle disputes, through consultations if possible. By January 2008, only about 136 of the nearly 369 cases had reached the full panel process. Most of the rest have either been notified as settled “out of court” or remain in a prolonged consultation phase — some since 1995.
Click the + to open an item.
Understanding the WTO
Basics
Agreements
Settling disputes
A unique contribution
The panel process
Case study
Cross-cutting and new issues
The Doha agenda
Developing countries
The organization
Abbreviations
More introductory information
> The WTO in Brief
> 10 benefits
> 10 misunderstandings
Principles: equitable, fast, effective, mutually acceptable back to top
Disputes in the WTO are essentially about broken promises. WTO members have agreed that if they believe fellow-members are violating trade rules, they will use the multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally. That means abiding by the agreed procedures, and respecting judgements.
A dispute arises when one country adopts a trade policy measure or takes some action that one or more fellow-WTO members considers to be breaking the WTO agreements, or to be a failure to live up to obligations. A third group of countries can declare that they have an interest in the case and enjoy some rights.
A procedure for settling disputes existed under the old GATT, but it had no fixed timetables, rulings were easier to block, and many cases dragged on for a long time inconclusively. The Uruguay Round agreement introduced a more structured process with more clearly defined stages in the procedure.
Dispute settlement is the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and the WTO’s unique contribution to the stability of the global economy. Without a means of settling disputes, the rules-based system would be less effective because the rules could not be enforced. The WTO’s procedure underscores the rule of law, and it makes the trading system more secure and predictable. The system is based on clearly-defined rules, with timetables for completing a case. First rulings are made by a panel and endorsed (or rejected) by the WTO’s full membership. Appeals based on points of law are possible.
However, the point is not to pass judgement. The priority is to settle disputes, through consultations if possible. By January 2008, only about 136 of the nearly 369 cases had reached the full panel process. Most of the rest have either been notified as settled “out of court” or remain in a prolonged consultation phase — some since 1995.
Click the + to open an item.
Understanding the WTO
Basics
Agreements
Settling disputes
A unique contribution
The panel process
Case study
Cross-cutting and new issues
The Doha agenda
Developing countries
The organization
Abbreviations
More introductory information
> The WTO in Brief
> 10 benefits
> 10 misunderstandings
Principles: equitable, fast, effective, mutually acceptable back to top
Disputes in the WTO are essentially about broken promises. WTO members have agreed that if they believe fellow-members are violating trade rules, they will use the multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally. That means abiding by the agreed procedures, and respecting judgements.
A dispute arises when one country adopts a trade policy measure or takes some action that one or more fellow-WTO members considers to be breaking the WTO agreements, or to be a failure to live up to obligations. A third group of countries can declare that they have an interest in the case and enjoy some rights.
A procedure for settling disputes existed under the old GATT, but it had no fixed timetables, rulings were easier to block, and many cases dragged on for a long time inconclusively. The Uruguay Round agreement introduced a more structured process with more clearly defined stages in the procedure.
Keep Europe Out of the Tar Sands
Let the informed people take care of it- it involves agriculture the management of the supply side.etc. The kids should study law..."It is hard to be smart when you are angry."
Media Advisory: Trade Justice Network to Challenge Canada-EU Free Trade Talks in Brussels, Strasbourg
Media Advisory: Trade Justice Network to Challenge Canada-EU Free Trade Talks in Brussels, Strasbourg It saddens me to think that these young men are foolishly spending my money- they are NOT even lawyers- and which is why they are considered a joke.
OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Jan. 14, 2011) - A sixth round of Canada-European Union negotiations toward a "Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement" (CETA), or free trade agreement, happen from January 17 to 21 in Brussels.
WHAT: Members of the Trade Justice Network (www.tradejustice.ca), which comprises over two dozen Canadian environmental, labour, Indigenous, farmers, and social justice organizations critical of the CETA negotiations, will travel to Brussels and Strasbourg next week to meet with European decision makers and civil society groups. They will express their opposition to many parts of the agreement, in particular its proposed investment protections, the threats CETA poses to public water and local procurement, and the constraints CETA will put on effective climate and environmental policy in Canada and the EU.
WHEN: January 17 to 21, 2011
WHO: Members of the Trade Justice Network travelling to Brussels and Strasbourg include:
- Brent Patterson, director of campaigns, and Stuart Trew, trade campaigner, both with the Council of Canadians - Clayton Thomas-Muller, Indigenous tar sands campaigner with The Indigenous Environmental Network
OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Jan. 14, 2011) - A sixth round of Canada-European Union negotiations toward a "Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement" (CETA), or free trade agreement, happen from January 17 to 21 in Brussels.
WHAT: Members of the Trade Justice Network (www.tradejustice.ca), which comprises over two dozen Canadian environmental, labour, Indigenous, farmers, and social justice organizations critical of the CETA negotiations, will travel to Brussels and Strasbourg next week to meet with European decision makers and civil society groups. They will express their opposition to many parts of the agreement, in particular its proposed investment protections, the threats CETA poses to public water and local procurement, and the constraints CETA will put on effective climate and environmental policy in Canada and the EU.
WHEN: January 17 to 21, 2011
WHO: Members of the Trade Justice Network travelling to Brussels and Strasbourg include:
- Brent Patterson, director of campaigns, and Stuart Trew, trade campaigner, both with the Council of Canadians - Clayton Thomas-Muller, Indigenous tar sands campaigner with The Indigenous Environmental Network
Bretton Woods , New Hampshire 1944-1959
The Bretton Woods Conference took place in July 1944, but did not become operative until 1959, when all the European currencies became convertible. Under this system, the IMF and the IBRD were established. The IMF was developed as a permanent international body. The summary of agreements states, "The nations should consult and agree on international monetary changes which affect each other. They should outlaw practices which are agreed to be harmful to world prosperity, and they should assist each other to overcome short-term exchange difficulties." The IBRD was created to speed up post-war reconstruction, to aid political stability, and to foster peace. This was to be fulfilled through the establishment of programs for reconstruction and development.
The main terms of this agreement were:
1.Formation of the IMF and the IBRD (presently part of the World Bank).
2.Adjustably pegged foreign exchange market rate system: The exchange rates were fixed, with the provision of changing them if necessary.
3.Currencies were required to be convertible for trade related and other current account transactions. The governments, however, had the power to regulate ostentatious capital flows.
4.As it was possible that exchange rates thus established might not be favourable to a country's balance of payments position, the governments had the power to revise them by up to 10%.
5.All member countries were required to subscribe to the IMF's capital.
[edit] Encouraging open marketsThe seminal idea behind the Bretton Woods Conference was the notion of open markets. In Henry Morgenthau's farewell remarks at the conference, he stated that the establishment of the IMF and the World Bank marked the end of economic nationalism. This meant countries would maintain their national interest, but trade blocks and economic spheres of influence would no longer be their means. The second idea behind the Bretton Woods Conference was joint management of the Western political-economic order. Meaning that the foremost industrial democratic nations must lower barriers to trade and the movement of capital, in addition to their responsibility to govern the system.
[edit] The Bank for International Settlements controversyIn the last stages of the Second World War, in 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference, the Bank for International Settlements became the crux of a fight that broke out when the Norwegian delegation put forth evidence that the BIS was guilty of war crimes and put forth a motion to dissolve the bank; the Americans, specifically President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, supported this motion. This resulted in a fight between, on one side, several European nations, the American and the Norwegian delegation, led by Henry Morgenthau and Harry Dexter White; and on the other side, the British delegation, headed by John Maynard Keynes and Chase Bank representative Dean Acheson, who tried to veto the dissolution of the bank.
The problem was that the BIS, formed in 1930, had as the main proponents of its establishment the then Governor of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman, and his colleague Hjalmar Schacht, later Adolf Hitler's finance minister. The Bank was as far as known, originally primarily intended to facilitate money transfers arising from settling an obligation from the peace treaty after WWI. After World
The main terms of this agreement were:
1.Formation of the IMF and the IBRD (presently part of the World Bank).
2.Adjustably pegged foreign exchange market rate system: The exchange rates were fixed, with the provision of changing them if necessary.
3.Currencies were required to be convertible for trade related and other current account transactions. The governments, however, had the power to regulate ostentatious capital flows.
4.As it was possible that exchange rates thus established might not be favourable to a country's balance of payments position, the governments had the power to revise them by up to 10%.
5.All member countries were required to subscribe to the IMF's capital.
[edit] Encouraging open marketsThe seminal idea behind the Bretton Woods Conference was the notion of open markets. In Henry Morgenthau's farewell remarks at the conference, he stated that the establishment of the IMF and the World Bank marked the end of economic nationalism. This meant countries would maintain their national interest, but trade blocks and economic spheres of influence would no longer be their means. The second idea behind the Bretton Woods Conference was joint management of the Western political-economic order. Meaning that the foremost industrial democratic nations must lower barriers to trade and the movement of capital, in addition to their responsibility to govern the system.
[edit] The Bank for International Settlements controversyIn the last stages of the Second World War, in 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference, the Bank for International Settlements became the crux of a fight that broke out when the Norwegian delegation put forth evidence that the BIS was guilty of war crimes and put forth a motion to dissolve the bank; the Americans, specifically President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, supported this motion. This resulted in a fight between, on one side, several European nations, the American and the Norwegian delegation, led by Henry Morgenthau and Harry Dexter White; and on the other side, the British delegation, headed by John Maynard Keynes and Chase Bank representative Dean Acheson, who tried to veto the dissolution of the bank.
The problem was that the BIS, formed in 1930, had as the main proponents of its establishment the then Governor of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman, and his colleague Hjalmar Schacht, later Adolf Hitler's finance minister. The Bank was as far as known, originally primarily intended to facilitate money transfers arising from settling an obligation from the peace treaty after WWI. After World
Immigrant integration in Federations
Forum of Federations - Global Dialogue
government within seven federations. It will also explore the degree to which policies and responsibilities have changed as the issue of immigrant integration has risen on the public agenda during the past decade.
Although the concept is defined in various ways, this project focuses on immigrant integration as the means to allow newcomers to participate in the economic, social and civic life of the host country. This is viewed as a two-way process: acquiring these capacities is the responsibility not only of newcomers but also the host society and its institutions. The project will focus on policy instruments to encourage immigrant integration in three categories: legal/political, economic and civic/cultural.
Activities
A workshop of the project collaborators was held in Berlin on February 22, 2010. Three additional events involving a number of those involved in the project were co-sponsored with local partners: a conference on “Immigrant Integration in Switzerland” in Bern on February 24 and 25, 2010 (with the Federal Office for Migration); a workshop on “Immigration Policies in Spain” in Barcelona on March 26, 2010 (with Institut d'Estudis Autonòmics); and a conference in Brussels on November 29 and 30, 2010.
A further event, a conference on “Immigrant Integration and Canadian Federalism: Exploring the Issues,” will be held in Toronto on January 28, 2011.
The project will lead to the publication of a comparative volume, which will include a policy-oriented concluding chapter written by the co-directors
government within seven federations. It will also explore the degree to which policies and responsibilities have changed as the issue of immigrant integration has risen on the public agenda during the past decade.
Although the concept is defined in various ways, this project focuses on immigrant integration as the means to allow newcomers to participate in the economic, social and civic life of the host country. This is viewed as a two-way process: acquiring these capacities is the responsibility not only of newcomers but also the host society and its institutions. The project will focus on policy instruments to encourage immigrant integration in three categories: legal/political, economic and civic/cultural.
Activities
A workshop of the project collaborators was held in Berlin on February 22, 2010. Three additional events involving a number of those involved in the project were co-sponsored with local partners: a conference on “Immigrant Integration in Switzerland” in Bern on February 24 and 25, 2010 (with the Federal Office for Migration); a workshop on “Immigration Policies in Spain” in Barcelona on March 26, 2010 (with Institut d'Estudis Autonòmics); and a conference in Brussels on November 29 and 30, 2010.
A further event, a conference on “Immigrant Integration and Canadian Federalism: Exploring the Issues,” will be held in Toronto on January 28, 2011.
The project will lead to the publication of a comparative volume, which will include a policy-oriented concluding chapter written by the co-directors
Rhetoric and Realit(ies): Framing and Claiming in China’s Relations with Africa
Friday January 14
Print Page
Series
East Asia Seminar Series
Room Information
Date Time Location
Fri Jan 14 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM 108N, North House
Speakers
Julia Strauss
Speaker
Senior Lecturer in Chinese Politics, Department of Politics and International Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Contact Info
Friday January 14
Print Page
Series
East Asia Seminar Series
Room Information
Date Time Location
Fri Jan 14 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM 108N, North House
Speakers
Julia Strauss
Speaker
Senior Lecturer in Chinese Politics, Department of Politics and International Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Contact Info
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Cancun Files: WTO Opens to Tragedy and Protest TOM HAYDEN / AlterNet 11sep03
Cancun Files: WTO Opens to Tragedy and Protest TOM HAYDEN / AlterNet 11sep03
CANCUN, Sept. 10. – A South Korean farmer, Kun Hai Lee, committed ritual suicide during the WTO's opening day to protest the organization's agricultural policies.
Witnesses said Lee stood in front of police lines, declared that "the WTO kills farmers," and then slashed himself to death with a blade. His suicide came on South Korea's Day of the Dead.
Few at the demonstration realized what had occurred until later in the day. As word slowly spread of the suicide, supporters of Kun Hai Lee vowed to protest his martyrdom throughout the coming week, possibly starting with a tent city at the barricades where the death occurred.
The WTO Secretariat issued a one-paragraph statement of "regret" at the death that they described as resulting from a "self-inflicted" wound. Lee's supporters condemned the WTO for the callous description of his death as self-inflicted, which absolved the organization of any responsibility in his death or the fate of thousands of farmers suffering from its policies.
Lee was known for a previous hunger strike outside the WTO Secretariat in Geneva. A decade ago, three South Korean farmers attempted to immolate themselves, and one died, in anti-WTO protests.
Lee's suicide marked the tragic end of a day of loud and sometimes violent protest. Earlier in the day, twenty global justice activists peacefully disrupted today's opening ceremony, sealing their mouths with masking tape to represent the voiceless, but left before they were arrested. Carrying bilingual placards proclaiming "WTO anti-development," "WTO obsolete," and "WTO undemocratic," they visibly ruffled the feathers of the trade organization's director-general, Supachai Panitchpakdi of Thailand.
Hours later, thousands of campesinos, marching from Cancun's barrio towards the posh hotel zone where the WTO is headquartered, were blocked by a wire-mesh fence and heavily armed police. Immediately, more militant members of direct action affinity groups from the so-called Black Bloc swarmed the fence to unsuccessfully tear it down.
Black Bloc describes itself as a tactic rather than an organization – a loose and changing collection of anarchist groups who come together for a specific action. The militants appeared to include Mexican students, Europeans with black flags, Koreans and a few from the U.S. As they raged
CANCUN, Sept. 10. – A South Korean farmer, Kun Hai Lee, committed ritual suicide during the WTO's opening day to protest the organization's agricultural policies.
Witnesses said Lee stood in front of police lines, declared that "the WTO kills farmers," and then slashed himself to death with a blade. His suicide came on South Korea's Day of the Dead.
Few at the demonstration realized what had occurred until later in the day. As word slowly spread of the suicide, supporters of Kun Hai Lee vowed to protest his martyrdom throughout the coming week, possibly starting with a tent city at the barricades where the death occurred.
The WTO Secretariat issued a one-paragraph statement of "regret" at the death that they described as resulting from a "self-inflicted" wound. Lee's supporters condemned the WTO for the callous description of his death as self-inflicted, which absolved the organization of any responsibility in his death or the fate of thousands of farmers suffering from its policies.
Lee was known for a previous hunger strike outside the WTO Secretariat in Geneva. A decade ago, three South Korean farmers attempted to immolate themselves, and one died, in anti-WTO protests.
Lee's suicide marked the tragic end of a day of loud and sometimes violent protest. Earlier in the day, twenty global justice activists peacefully disrupted today's opening ceremony, sealing their mouths with masking tape to represent the voiceless, but left before they were arrested. Carrying bilingual placards proclaiming "WTO anti-development," "WTO obsolete," and "WTO undemocratic," they visibly ruffled the feathers of the trade organization's director-general, Supachai Panitchpakdi of Thailand.
Hours later, thousands of campesinos, marching from Cancun's barrio towards the posh hotel zone where the WTO is headquartered, were blocked by a wire-mesh fence and heavily armed police. Immediately, more militant members of direct action affinity groups from the so-called Black Bloc swarmed the fence to unsuccessfully tear it down.
Black Bloc describes itself as a tactic rather than an organization – a loose and changing collection of anarchist groups who come together for a specific action. The militants appeared to include Mexican students, Europeans with black flags, Koreans and a few from the U.S. As they raged
Monday, January 10, 2011
Serbia to Sign Trade Agreement With EU as Part of WTO Entry - Bloomberg
Serbia to Sign Trade Agreement With EU as Part of WTO Entry - Bloomberg
Serbia and the European Union will sign a trade agreement tomorrow, as part of the Balkan nation’s World Trade Organization entry.
Serbia wants to join the WTO by the end of the year, according to a statement today from Economy Minister Mladjan Dinkic, who will sign the accord with EU Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht.
To gain WTO entry, Serbia needs to remove or lower trade barriers with other members of the organization that request it. The country’s trade relations with the EU were defined in previous agreement’s with the bloc as the Balkan nation works toward membership.
Serbia applied for WTO membership in 2005. The country has completed all multilateral talks and signed bilateral accords with Japan, Norway, Honduras and South Korea. After the EU, it needs to complete WTO-related talks with the U.S., Brazil, Canada, Switzerland and Ukraine. The agreement with Canada may be signed this month, Dinkic said.
To contact the reporter on this story: {Misha Savic} in Belgrade at msavic2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James M. Gomez at
Serbia and the European Union will sign a trade agreement tomorrow, as part of the Balkan nation’s World Trade Organization entry.
Serbia wants to join the WTO by the end of the year, according to a statement today from Economy Minister Mladjan Dinkic, who will sign the accord with EU Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht.
To gain WTO entry, Serbia needs to remove or lower trade barriers with other members of the organization that request it. The country’s trade relations with the EU were defined in previous agreement’s with the bloc as the Balkan nation works toward membership.
Serbia applied for WTO membership in 2005. The country has completed all multilateral talks and signed bilateral accords with Japan, Norway, Honduras and South Korea. After the EU, it needs to complete WTO-related talks with the U.S., Brazil, Canada, Switzerland and Ukraine. The agreement with Canada may be signed this month, Dinkic said.
To contact the reporter on this story: {Misha Savic} in Belgrade at msavic2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James M. Gomez at
CETA in ottawa
main topic at Jean Monnet Seminar on Sustainable Dev. Law, Jan 14, 11:30-1:30 at the U of Ottawa Law School (Fauteux Hall), Rm 202
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Round Table Discussions | World Future Energy Summit 2011
Round Table Discussions | World Future Energy Summit 2011
Day 1 – Monday, January 17, 2011
Round Table Discussions Session from 14:00 – 14:45
Geothermal Energy Advances in the GW Category
Prof. Gustv R. Grob, Fellow of Energy Institute London, Dean, em
Fresnel Based CSP: Experience of a Grid Coupled Direct Steam Generating Plant
Eng. Manfred Engelhard, Technology Manager Energy, M + W Group, Stuttgart, Germany
The Role of Discipline of Architecture in Formulating Urban Typologies capable of Cultivating Emergent Social Capital
Dr. Abeer Aljanahi, Assistant Professor of Architecture and urban Planning/ WS Atkins, British University in Dubai/ WS Atkins
PV Technologies for Large – Scale Deployement in the GCC
Dr. Mahieddine Emziane, CSci, MinstP, MIEEE, Associate Professor – Solar Energy & Materials & Devices Lab, Masdar Institute of Science & Technology
Round Table Discussions Session from 15:00 – 15:45
Private Equity Financing for Offshore Wind Farms During Implementation Phase
Mr. Martin Billhardt, PNE Wind AG, Germany
Improve Energy Efficiency in Air-Conditioning Through Performance Inspections
Mr. Klas Berglof, Managing Director, ClimaCheck Sweden AB
Geothermal Development in India
Dr. Ritesh Arya, Geologist, Arya Geo Energy, Haryana, India
Requirements for Investments in Liberalized Power Markets
Prof. Dr. Roland Roesch, University of Applied Science Darmstadt, Germany
Round Table Discussions Session from 16:00 – 16:45
Modular Design for Redundancy and Energy Efficiency
Mr. Michael Clatworthy, Director of Worldwide Sales, Muitistack, USA
The Balance of Investment in Industrial Production of Solar, Wind & Bio – Technology Versus International RE Market Stimulation
Dr. Franz Baumgartner, Zhaw, Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Energy Efficient Waste Collection At High Recycling Levels
Mr. Jonas Tornblom, Director of Corporate Marketing, Envac AB , Stockholm, Sweden
Day 2 – Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Round Table Discussions Sessions from 11:00 – 11:45
Only with Technological Advancement in PV Solar Power Generation will the Consumer, Investor and the Environment Fully Benefit
Simon Biancardi, International Strategist and General Counsel, Day4 Energy Inc.
Renewable Energy Ready Micro-Grid System for Remote Area
Mr. Markson Tang, Executive Director, Daily Life Renewable Energy
Dynamic Next Generation Façade System: HelioTrace
Mr. Nicholas Holt, Director, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP, New York, USA
UNIDO – ICHET Hydrogen Technology Projects for Clean Future
Dr. Mustafa Hatipoglu, Managing Director of UNIDO – ICHET, Turkey
Mandatory Energy-Efficiency Standards for Products – How they Will Affect Future Production
Prof. Dr. Ulrich Ellinghaus, Attorney, Baker & McKenzie, Germany
Round Table Discussions Session from 12:00 – 12:45
Center for Architecture Science and Ecology
Ann Dyson, Director, Center for Architecture Science and Ecology, New York, USA
The History of Building Integrated Photovoltaics and its Outreach to the MENA Region
Dr. Claas Helmke, Manager marketing, System & Service, Masdar PV
Hydrogen Economy: Is It for me or My Grandchildren
Day 1 – Monday, January 17, 2011
Round Table Discussions Session from 14:00 – 14:45
Geothermal Energy Advances in the GW Category
Prof. Gustv R. Grob, Fellow of Energy Institute London, Dean, em
Fresnel Based CSP: Experience of a Grid Coupled Direct Steam Generating Plant
Eng. Manfred Engelhard, Technology Manager Energy, M + W Group, Stuttgart, Germany
The Role of Discipline of Architecture in Formulating Urban Typologies capable of Cultivating Emergent Social Capital
Dr. Abeer Aljanahi, Assistant Professor of Architecture and urban Planning/ WS Atkins, British University in Dubai/ WS Atkins
PV Technologies for Large – Scale Deployement in the GCC
Dr. Mahieddine Emziane, CSci, MinstP, MIEEE, Associate Professor – Solar Energy & Materials & Devices Lab, Masdar Institute of Science & Technology
Round Table Discussions Session from 15:00 – 15:45
Private Equity Financing for Offshore Wind Farms During Implementation Phase
Mr. Martin Billhardt, PNE Wind AG, Germany
Improve Energy Efficiency in Air-Conditioning Through Performance Inspections
Mr. Klas Berglof, Managing Director, ClimaCheck Sweden AB
Geothermal Development in India
Dr. Ritesh Arya, Geologist, Arya Geo Energy, Haryana, India
Requirements for Investments in Liberalized Power Markets
Prof. Dr. Roland Roesch, University of Applied Science Darmstadt, Germany
Round Table Discussions Session from 16:00 – 16:45
Modular Design for Redundancy and Energy Efficiency
Mr. Michael Clatworthy, Director of Worldwide Sales, Muitistack, USA
The Balance of Investment in Industrial Production of Solar, Wind & Bio – Technology Versus International RE Market Stimulation
Dr. Franz Baumgartner, Zhaw, Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Energy Efficient Waste Collection At High Recycling Levels
Mr. Jonas Tornblom, Director of Corporate Marketing, Envac AB , Stockholm, Sweden
Day 2 – Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Round Table Discussions Sessions from 11:00 – 11:45
Only with Technological Advancement in PV Solar Power Generation will the Consumer, Investor and the Environment Fully Benefit
Simon Biancardi, International Strategist and General Counsel, Day4 Energy Inc.
Renewable Energy Ready Micro-Grid System for Remote Area
Mr. Markson Tang, Executive Director, Daily Life Renewable Energy
Dynamic Next Generation Façade System: HelioTrace
Mr. Nicholas Holt, Director, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP, New York, USA
UNIDO – ICHET Hydrogen Technology Projects for Clean Future
Dr. Mustafa Hatipoglu, Managing Director of UNIDO – ICHET, Turkey
Mandatory Energy-Efficiency Standards for Products – How they Will Affect Future Production
Prof. Dr. Ulrich Ellinghaus, Attorney, Baker & McKenzie, Germany
Round Table Discussions Session from 12:00 – 12:45
Center for Architecture Science and Ecology
Ann Dyson, Director, Center for Architecture Science and Ecology, New York, USA
The History of Building Integrated Photovoltaics and its Outreach to the MENA Region
Dr. Claas Helmke, Manager marketing, System & Service, Masdar PV
Hydrogen Economy: Is It for me or My Grandchildren
Friday, January 7, 2011
CTV News | At the gates of Europe: Canada's top negotiator on EU free-trade
CTV News | At the gates of Europe: Canada's top negotiator on EU free-trade
Pro- EU Free Trade by CTV news
Overcoming foreign trade restrictions remains a challenge for Canadian business. In Europe, a free-trade deal, currently being negotiated with Canada, could open up service sectors to Canadian companies, reduce barriers to investment and provide transparent rules and processes. All are changes that could prove helpful to small and medium sized businesses, says Steve Verheul, Canada’s chief negotiator for the pact.
“We would be the only developed country with this kind of access into the EU,” he says.
Mr. Verheul, 50, has been Canada’s chief negotiator since free-trade talks with Europe started in May, 2009. His goal, he says, is for the deal to be broader than the North American Free Trade Agreement and “deeper in ambition.”
Why such a broad and deep free trade deal with Europe?
It’s something we’ve been wanting for a long time. Someone said it goes back 30 years. We obviously rely quite heavily on the U.S. market and there’s been an interest in diversifying into other markets. The European market is the largest, wealthiest single market in the world. Plus, we have a lot of cultural and historical ties with Europe. It made it a natural ally for a free-trade agreement.
Where are the negotiations at?
We’ve been through five rounds of negotiations; we’ve got two more planned for early next year. We’re anticipating concluding the negotiations later in the year. We’ve
Pro- EU Free Trade by CTV news
Overcoming foreign trade restrictions remains a challenge for Canadian business. In Europe, a free-trade deal, currently being negotiated with Canada, could open up service sectors to Canadian companies, reduce barriers to investment and provide transparent rules and processes. All are changes that could prove helpful to small and medium sized businesses, says Steve Verheul, Canada’s chief negotiator for the pact.
“We would be the only developed country with this kind of access into the EU,” he says.
Mr. Verheul, 50, has been Canada’s chief negotiator since free-trade talks with Europe started in May, 2009. His goal, he says, is for the deal to be broader than the North American Free Trade Agreement and “deeper in ambition.”
Why such a broad and deep free trade deal with Europe?
It’s something we’ve been wanting for a long time. Someone said it goes back 30 years. We obviously rely quite heavily on the U.S. market and there’s been an interest in diversifying into other markets. The European market is the largest, wealthiest single market in the world. Plus, we have a lot of cultural and historical ties with Europe. It made it a natural ally for a free-trade agreement.
Where are the negotiations at?
We’ve been through five rounds of negotiations; we’ve got two more planned for early next year. We’re anticipating concluding the negotiations later in the year. We’ve
SSRN-Harmonizing Climate Change and International Investment Law: Threats, Challenges and Opportunities by Daniel Firger
SSRN-Harmonizing Climate Change and International Investment Law: Threats, Challenges and Opportunities by Daniel Firger
Columbia University: New York Climate Change Law
Abstract:
This chapter responds to a chorus of commentary about the potential for conflict between the international investment law regime and an array of national and international actions being undertaken to mitigate and adapt to global climate change. Contrary to conventional wisdom, while some climate-friendly regulations may indeed be facially incompatible with the obligations imposed on states by typical international investment agreements (IIAs), many climate policies – especially those related to climate finance and technology transfer – involve principles common to foreign investment law and are largely compatible with that regime. Moreover, pending the unlikely negotiation of a single global agreement on climate change, states are initiating a host of national, bilateral and regional initiatives to encourage certain kinds of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows in the hope of catalyzing low-carbon growth. These sorts of strategies will benefit from a flexible and responsive set of rules governing climate-friendly FDI, something the international investment law regime is uniquely positioned to provide. Meanwhile, international investment law is itself undergoing a transformation of sorts, as more serious consideration is given to the environmental and social impacts of foreign investment and as global capital flows become increasingly multidirectional, calling into question longstanding distinctions between FDI host countries and the home countries of investors. Rather than signaling conflict, recent trends in climate policy and international investment law indicate that both regimes are entering a new phase characterized by coordination, harmonization, and mutual learning. This chapter maps this emerging territory and identifies key opportunities to shape the interaction between the two disciplines.
Working Paper Series
Date posted: January 03, 2011
Suggested Citation
Firger, Daniel M., Harmonizing Climate Change and International Investment Law: Threats, Challenges and Opportunities (December 15, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1733985
Export to: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RefWorks Export Citation What's this?
Contact Information
Daniel M. Firger (Contact Author)
Columbia Center for Climate Change Law ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
New York University (NYU) - School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Columbia University: New York Climate Change Law
Abstract:
This chapter responds to a chorus of commentary about the potential for conflict between the international investment law regime and an array of national and international actions being undertaken to mitigate and adapt to global climate change. Contrary to conventional wisdom, while some climate-friendly regulations may indeed be facially incompatible with the obligations imposed on states by typical international investment agreements (IIAs), many climate policies – especially those related to climate finance and technology transfer – involve principles common to foreign investment law and are largely compatible with that regime. Moreover, pending the unlikely negotiation of a single global agreement on climate change, states are initiating a host of national, bilateral and regional initiatives to encourage certain kinds of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows in the hope of catalyzing low-carbon growth. These sorts of strategies will benefit from a flexible and responsive set of rules governing climate-friendly FDI, something the international investment law regime is uniquely positioned to provide. Meanwhile, international investment law is itself undergoing a transformation of sorts, as more serious consideration is given to the environmental and social impacts of foreign investment and as global capital flows become increasingly multidirectional, calling into question longstanding distinctions between FDI host countries and the home countries of investors. Rather than signaling conflict, recent trends in climate policy and international investment law indicate that both regimes are entering a new phase characterized by coordination, harmonization, and mutual learning. This chapter maps this emerging territory and identifies key opportunities to shape the interaction between the two disciplines.
Working Paper Series
Date posted: January 03, 2011
Suggested Citation
Firger, Daniel M., Harmonizing Climate Change and International Investment Law: Threats, Challenges and Opportunities (December 15, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1733985
Export to: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RefWorks Export Citation What's this?
Contact Information
Daniel M. Firger (Contact Author)
Columbia Center for Climate Change Law ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
New York University (NYU) - School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
CETA and Council of Canadians
I should preface this by saying that I have some respect for the C of C and that as far as Canadian activists groups go they easily surpass the others in term of organizational skills, clarity in communication, etc. I do not think, however, that a petition is the best way to lead a fight against CETA. Given the paucity of corporate coverage on CETA, it would seem a more aggressive campaign would be required. For example, I notice the Winnipeg chapter has a facebook page to which they load videos. It might be an idea for them to do on the street interviews/video push-polls which ask people about what they know of CETA, whether they know it would prevent Canada from makings its own solar panels, windmills and practically force Canada to import them. This would encourage people to discuss the issue and promote C of C's websites, materials, etc.
I would be curious to know if there are any C of C members here on rabble/babble and what they think.
- by 2dawal rabble January 7th,2011
I would be curious to know if there are any C of C members here on rabble/babble and what they think.
- by 2dawal rabble January 7th,2011
Common Ground - November 2010 CETA /Agriculture
Common Ground - November 2010
The fourth round of negotiations over a new trade agreement between Canada and Europe – CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) – took place in Ottawa last month and yet few Canadians have even heard of this trade deal. Many Canadians might expect a trade deal with Europe to be a progressive step forward, but, in this case, the opposite is true. The trade deal threatens to give biotech, pharmaceutical, pesticide and seed and grain companies powerful new tools to force farmers to buy gene-patented seeds at high prices. Worse, it will almost entirely eliminate the rights of farmers to save, reuse, exchange and sell seed.
This so-called bilateral agreement between the European Union and Canada is, in reality, a deal between Canada and the 27 member states of the European Union and, as such, it is hardly bilateral. That being said, the European Commission is negotiating this trade deal on behalf of EU member states and aggressively pushing an extreme right-wing agenda. Coupled with strong Canadian leanings in the same direction, the agreement is providing a platform for our government to bring forward legislation that would likely never pass on its own. Essentially, CETA is a “lets get it in the back door” approach from both sides of the Atlantic. This is exacerbated because the negotiation process is semi-secret where the “parties” have agreed not to disclose the content of the text while negotiations are in progress.
The National Farmers Union was able to obtain a leaked draft text
The fourth round of negotiations over a new trade agreement between Canada and Europe – CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) – took place in Ottawa last month and yet few Canadians have even heard of this trade deal. Many Canadians might expect a trade deal with Europe to be a progressive step forward, but, in this case, the opposite is true. The trade deal threatens to give biotech, pharmaceutical, pesticide and seed and grain companies powerful new tools to force farmers to buy gene-patented seeds at high prices. Worse, it will almost entirely eliminate the rights of farmers to save, reuse, exchange and sell seed.
This so-called bilateral agreement between the European Union and Canada is, in reality, a deal between Canada and the 27 member states of the European Union and, as such, it is hardly bilateral. That being said, the European Commission is negotiating this trade deal on behalf of EU member states and aggressively pushing an extreme right-wing agenda. Coupled with strong Canadian leanings in the same direction, the agreement is providing a platform for our government to bring forward legislation that would likely never pass on its own. Essentially, CETA is a “lets get it in the back door” approach from both sides of the Atlantic. This is exacerbated because the negotiation process is semi-secret where the “parties” have agreed not to disclose the content of the text while negotiations are in progress.
The National Farmers Union was able to obtain a leaked draft text
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Conference Board News Release > Canada‘s Generation Gap Follows North-South Boundaries
Conference Board News Release > Canada‘s Generation Gap Follows North-South Boundaries
According to the 2006 census, more than 20 per cent of the population in most of Canada’s Northern regions was under the age of 15. In contrast, only a handful of areas in Southern Canada had 20 per cent of their residents in this age cohort.
The youth of the Northern population is most apparent in Northern Saskatchewan, Nunavut and Northern Manitoba, where 30 per cent or more of the residents were under the age of 15 in 2006. The Northwest Territories (24 per cent), Northern Alberta (23 per cent), Northern Newfoundland and Labrador (21 per cent), Northern British Columbia (20 per cent), and Yukon (19 per cent) also had shares of their populations under 15 that were equal to or greater than any region of Southern Canada.
Nationally, the population is aging rapidly. The Conference Board of Canada predicts that the number of Canadians aged 65 years or over will surpass the number of children 15 or younger for the first time in the country’s history in 2019. In the North, however, the number of children will still be more than double the number of seniors.
In 2009, 4.7 million Canadians were 65 or older, about 13.9 per cent of the total population. By 2025, the Conference Board’s long-term economic outlook projects that Canadians 65 and older will make up 20 per cent of the population. In contrast, only 7.2 per cent of the population in Nunavut is expected to be 65
GATT= General Agreemenst to Trade &Tariffs.
According to the 2006 census, more than 20 per cent of the population in most of Canada’s Northern regions was under the age of 15. In contrast, only a handful of areas in Southern Canada had 20 per cent of their residents in this age cohort.
The youth of the Northern population is most apparent in Northern Saskatchewan, Nunavut and Northern Manitoba, where 30 per cent or more of the residents were under the age of 15 in 2006. The Northwest Territories (24 per cent), Northern Alberta (23 per cent), Northern Newfoundland and Labrador (21 per cent), Northern British Columbia (20 per cent), and Yukon (19 per cent) also had shares of their populations under 15 that were equal to or greater than any region of Southern Canada.
Nationally, the population is aging rapidly. The Conference Board of Canada predicts that the number of Canadians aged 65 years or over will surpass the number of children 15 or younger for the first time in the country’s history in 2019. In the North, however, the number of children will still be more than double the number of seniors.
In 2009, 4.7 million Canadians were 65 or older, about 13.9 per cent of the total population. By 2025, the Conference Board’s long-term economic outlook projects that Canadians 65 and older will make up 20 per cent of the population. In contrast, only 7.2 per cent of the population in Nunavut is expected to be 65
GATT= General Agreemenst to Trade &Tariffs.
Monday, January 3, 2011
Metalclad vs. Mexico, Toxic Waste and NAFTA | Solidarity
Metalclad vs. Mexico, Toxic Waste and NAFTA | Solidarity
Metalclad vs. Mexico, Toxic Waste and NAFTA
— Gerard Greenfield
LAST AUGUST 25 the NAFTA Tribunal for the case of Metalclad Corp vs. Mexico ruled in favor of Metalclad, ordering the Mexican government to pay US$16.7 million in compensation. It is the first ruling in an investor-to-state lawsuit under NAFTA.
In October 1996, Metalclad Corporation, a U.S. waste-disposal company, accused the Mexican government of violating NAFTA's Chapter 11 when the state of San Luis Potos<161> refused it permission to reopen a waste disposal facility.
The state governor ordered the site closed down after a geological audit showed the facility would contaminate the local water supply. The governor then declared the site part of a 600,000-acre ecological zone. Metalclad claimed that this constituted an act of expropriation and sought US$90 million in compensation.
All of these cases are based on the "rights" of investors guaranteed in NAFTA's Chapter 11, where a broad definition of "expropriation" is combined with the right of investors to directly sue governments for compensation (under "investor-to-state" dispute resolution).
A September 1 article in The Globe & Mail on the Metalclad ruling (again) drew attention to the threat posed by Chapter 11 to government regulations protecting the environment and public health. This may even add to the ongoing (though low-key) debate on whether the wording of investment rules should be revised.
Metalclad vs. Mexico, Toxic Waste and NAFTA
— Gerard Greenfield
LAST AUGUST 25 the NAFTA Tribunal for the case of Metalclad Corp vs. Mexico ruled in favor of Metalclad, ordering the Mexican government to pay US$16.7 million in compensation. It is the first ruling in an investor-to-state lawsuit under NAFTA.
In October 1996, Metalclad Corporation, a U.S. waste-disposal company, accused the Mexican government of violating NAFTA's Chapter 11 when the state of San Luis Potos<161> refused it permission to reopen a waste disposal facility.
The state governor ordered the site closed down after a geological audit showed the facility would contaminate the local water supply. The governor then declared the site part of a 600,000-acre ecological zone. Metalclad claimed that this constituted an act of expropriation and sought US$90 million in compensation.
All of these cases are based on the "rights" of investors guaranteed in NAFTA's Chapter 11, where a broad definition of "expropriation" is combined with the right of investors to directly sue governments for compensation (under "investor-to-state" dispute resolution).
A September 1 article in The Globe & Mail on the Metalclad ruling (again) drew attention to the threat posed by Chapter 11 to government regulations protecting the environment and public health. This may even add to the ongoing (though low-key) debate on whether the wording of investment rules should be revised.
In Boeing-Airbus Rivalry, Hidden Hand of Diplomats - NYTimes.com
In Boeing-Airbus Rivalry, Hidden Hand of Diplomats - NYTimes.com
Each of these government leaders had one thing in common: they were trying to decide whether to buy billions of dollars’ worth of commercial jets from Boeing or its European competitor, Airbus. And United States diplomats were acting like marketing agents, offering deals to heads of state and airline executives whose decisions could be influenced by price, performance and, as with all finicky customers with plenty to spend, perks.
Each of these government leaders had one thing in common: they were trying to decide whether to buy billions of dollars’ worth of commercial jets from Boeing or its European competitor, Airbus. And United States diplomats were acting like marketing agents, offering deals to heads of state and airline executives whose decisions could be influenced by price, performance and, as with all finicky customers with plenty to spend, perks.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Can trade in services offer an alternative to migration?
Can trade in services offer an alternative to migration? vox - Research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists
High unemployment among the young and low skilled is fuelling anti-immigration sentiments across the OECD. This column argues that, in Western Europe, demographic trends are such that demand for many workers will exceed supply. It proposes a framework that enables the temporary movement of services providers, a policy that could address Europe’s labour needs while placating public resistance.
Recently released data show that the US population has increased 9.7% since 2000, reaching almost 309 million (US 2010 Census). While low by US standards, this growth rate far exceeds European rates. Europe is facing a demographic dilemma. Low fertility rates and increased life expectancy mean that labour forces are shrinking as dependency ratios are rising.
Declining youth populations imply this is not a temporary pattern but a reflection of long-term trends. The implications for labour markets, welfare policies, and fiscal balances are significant. In contrast to Europe, southern Mediterranean countries have a temporary bulge in their young working-age populations. They will complete their demographic transition within one generation, but current excess labour supply is creating social and economic challenges.
Current demographic trends suggest that the EU will face a severe labour shortage over the next decade while Mediterranean countries will continue to experience significant growth in their labour forces (Figure 1). The recession is reducing migration incentives somewhat and economic growth and demographic transitions in developing nations will reduce long-run pressures to migrate (Hatton and Williamson 2009). But in the short to medium term, the diverging labour market trends in the EU and its neighbours imply substantial incentives for migration
High unemployment among the young and low skilled is fuelling anti-immigration sentiments across the OECD. This column argues that, in Western Europe, demographic trends are such that demand for many workers will exceed supply. It proposes a framework that enables the temporary movement of services providers, a policy that could address Europe’s labour needs while placating public resistance.
Recently released data show that the US population has increased 9.7% since 2000, reaching almost 309 million (US 2010 Census). While low by US standards, this growth rate far exceeds European rates. Europe is facing a demographic dilemma. Low fertility rates and increased life expectancy mean that labour forces are shrinking as dependency ratios are rising.
Declining youth populations imply this is not a temporary pattern but a reflection of long-term trends. The implications for labour markets, welfare policies, and fiscal balances are significant. In contrast to Europe, southern Mediterranean countries have a temporary bulge in their young working-age populations. They will complete their demographic transition within one generation, but current excess labour supply is creating social and economic challenges.
Current demographic trends suggest that the EU will face a severe labour shortage over the next decade while Mediterranean countries will continue to experience significant growth in their labour forces (Figure 1). The recession is reducing migration incentives somewhat and economic growth and demographic transitions in developing nations will reduce long-run pressures to migrate (Hatton and Williamson 2009). But in the short to medium term, the diverging labour market trends in the EU and its neighbours imply substantial incentives for migration
The chicken or the egg, Minister Renner? :: Parkland blog :: Parkland Institute
The chicken or the egg, Minister Renner? :: Parkland blog :: Parkland Institute
According to Alberta's Environment Minister Rob Renner, "The fact remains, we have to face the reality that there will not be a dramatic reduction in dependence on hydrocarbons until alternative kinds of fuel and energy are developed."
Actually, he has it backwards. Alternative fuels will not be developed as long as it is business as usual for fossil fuels - not unless we dramatically reduce subsidies to fossil fuels and level the playing field. Rob Seidel, the new chairman of the board of Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, stated in the Edmonton Journal that, "More than 800 people at U of A are working on new technology for the oilsands." This is at the University of Alberta alone. Imagine what that level of research and development would be able to accomplish if harnessed for renewable energy.
A recent international study by the International Institute for Sustainable Development found that Alberta gives an estimated $1.05 billion in direct subsidies to oil and gas. In contrast, Tim Weiss of the Pembina Institute states that Alberta has no serious program to encourage the development of wind and other renewables.
According to Alberta's Environment Minister Rob Renner, "The fact remains, we have to face the reality that there will not be a dramatic reduction in dependence on hydrocarbons until alternative kinds of fuel and energy are developed."
Actually, he has it backwards. Alternative fuels will not be developed as long as it is business as usual for fossil fuels - not unless we dramatically reduce subsidies to fossil fuels and level the playing field. Rob Seidel, the new chairman of the board of Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, stated in the Edmonton Journal that, "More than 800 people at U of A are working on new technology for the oilsands." This is at the University of Alberta alone. Imagine what that level of research and development would be able to accomplish if harnessed for renewable energy.
A recent international study by the International Institute for Sustainable Development found that Alberta gives an estimated $1.05 billion in direct subsidies to oil and gas. In contrast, Tim Weiss of the Pembina Institute states that Alberta has no serious program to encourage the development of wind and other renewables.
WTO Airbus Dispute
International Economic Law and Policy Blog: Report on the Second Oral Hearing in the WTO Airbus Dispute
Report on the Second Oral Hearing in the WTO Airbus Dispute
Here's more reporting on the WTO Appellate Body oral hearings in the Airbus dispute, by Malorie Schaus (malorie.schaus [at] graduateinstitute.ch) and Tobiasz Kaczor (tobiasz.kaczor [at] gmail.com) of the Graduate Institute in Geneva. This is their report of the participants' and third participants' oral statements and the second oral hearing: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/abhearings/WTO-Airbus-Case-Second-Hearing.pdf Thanks to both of them for all their hard work!
Posted by Simon Lester on January 02, 2011 at 08:21 AM in Airbus - Boeing Dispute | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c90a753ef0147e1348c6f970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Report on the Second Oral Hearing in the WTO Airbus Dispute:
Report on the Second Oral Hearing in the WTO Airbus Dispute
Here's more reporting on the WTO Appellate Body oral hearings in the Airbus dispute, by Malorie Schaus (malorie.schaus [at] graduateinstitute.ch) and Tobiasz Kaczor (tobiasz.kaczor [at] gmail.com) of the Graduate Institute in Geneva. This is their report of the participants' and third participants' oral statements and the second oral hearing: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/abhearings/WTO-Airbus-Case-Second-Hearing.pdf Thanks to both of them for all their hard work!
Posted by Simon Lester on January 02, 2011 at 08:21 AM in Airbus - Boeing Dispute | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c90a753ef0147e1348c6f970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Report on the Second Oral Hearing in the WTO Airbus Dispute:
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Zapitistas,Mexico,Property Rights & Mexico
The Zapatistas timed the rebellion to coincide with the implementation of NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, between Canada, the US and Mexico.
They called NAFTA a "death sentence", as it removed from the Mexican constitution Article 27, a provision won during the first Mexican revolution in the early part of the last century, designed to guarantee collective property rights to those who worked the land.
Vocal opposition to NAFTA gained the rebels support from trade unions and other social movements who tried - and failed - to stop the agreement.
They called NAFTA a "death sentence", as it removed from the Mexican constitution Article 27, a provision won during the first Mexican revolution in the early part of the last century, designed to guarantee collective property rights to those who worked the land.
Vocal opposition to NAFTA gained the rebels support from trade unions and other social movements who tried - and failed - to stop the agreement.
GATT formed 1949 was replaced by WTO in 1995
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (typically abbreviated GATT) was negotiated during the UN Conference on Trade and Employment and was the outcome of the failure of negotiating governments to create the International Trade Organization (ITO). GATT was formed in 1949 and lasted until 1993, when it was replaced by the World Trade Organization in 1995. The original GATT text (GATT 1947) is still in effect under the WTO framework, subject to the modifications of GATT 1994
SMILE! - Home
SMILE! - Home
Thanks for visiting!
We hope you can find everything you need. SMILE! is focused on providing high-quality service and customer satisfaction - we will do everything we can to meet your expectations.
We hope to see you again! Check back later for new updates to our website. There's much more to come!
Thanks for visiting!
We hope you can find everything you need. SMILE! is focused on providing high-quality service and customer satisfaction - we will do everything we can to meet your expectations.
We hope to see you again! Check back later for new updates to our website. There's much more to come!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)